So the final box I bought was 2016 Museum Collection. Last year the one box I bought was pretty bad. So I was a little apprehensive about buying one again this year. But after watching some breaks online I thought the 2016 version was gorgeous, So I decided to pick up a box. I would like to compare my 2016 box to the one I got in 2015, hit for hit.
On-Card Auto
2015
All-Star first baseman of the hottest team in baseball.
2016
Mediocre platoon catcher for one of he worst teams in baseball. WHY IS THIS GUY IN A HIGH END PRODUCT.
Advantage: 2015
Single Relic
These cards aren't exactly comparable since 2015 had jumbo relics and 2016 had small prime relics. But it'll do.
2015
Jumbo bat relic of a sometimes decent hitting outfielder on one of the worst teams in baseball.
2016
Low end patch of one of the top closers in baseball and the hardest throwing pitcher in history.
Advantage: 2016
Quad Relic
2015
Boring quad relic of a Hall of Fame third baseman.
2016
Somewhat more interesting quad relic of an outfielder for my least favorite team.
So this one is a little more interesting. The Ellsbury card is nicer looking by virtue of three pinstripes vs one on the Boggs card. But Boggs is a Hall of Famer, so..
Advantage: 2015
Auto-Relic
2015
All-Star second baseman for a bad team.
2016
Overpaid for, mediocre, overrated, POS woman beater from my favorite team. If ever there was a Braves hit that I did not want to pull, it was this one.
Advantage: 2015
So, 2015 felt really crappy at the time. And still does. And I thought there was no way it could get worse than that box. But good lord it sure got worse. WAY worse. As far as "bang for the buck" goes I think this is the worst box I have EVER opened of any product. If there is one single worst box of an entire print run, I think I ended up with it. Museum is going to have to really impress me next year if I am going to drop money on it again.
Hey I would be interested in trading for that boring Wade Boggs card. Let me know if you want to unload that boring card.
ReplyDelete